It's now during the add/drop period of this new semester. I've been struggling in deciding what math courses to take that do not conflict with my core courses, and at the same time maximizing the total utility in getting myself into a good shape for future studies in economics. That's when I come across
this article by Paul Krugman on the relationship between math and econ, and he writes:
[Y]ou can have great work in economics with little or no math. I can’t pull up papers now, but as I recall, Akerlof’s market for lemons had virtually no explicit math in its main exposition; yet it was transformative in its insight.
And later he says, "So by all means let’s have math in economics", but also stresses: "as our servant, not our master."
No comments:
Post a Comment